Abstract:
This essay explores the factors contributing to the high market prices of ancient artworks and their implications for contemporary art and cultural heritage preservation. By examining the role of provenance, rarity, and material value, the essay lays out a compelling narrative around why these artworks command such significant financial value. Through a comprehensive review of recent research, including influential works by Müller and Keim, the discussion highlights how historical significance enhances market valuation and presents a moral responsibility for restitution in cases of looted art. The analysis further delves into the financialization of art, revealing how ancient art prices set precedents for contemporary art valuation, thereby impacting artistic production trends and practices. Ethical considerations surrounding art repatriation and the delicate balance public institutions must strike in the face of commercial pressures are also discussed. The findings conclude that while high market prices reflect cultural and economic value, they can complicate efforts at preservation and equitable access to cultural heritage, emphasizing the need for comprehensive legal frameworks and responsible stewardship. The interconnectedness of art valuation and ethical considerations calls for deeper engagement with contemporary art policies and practices.
Keywords: Ancient Art, Market Prices, Provenance, Financialization, Cultural Heritage, Art Repatriation, Contemporary Art, Museums
1.1 Historical Significance: Provenance and Ownership Histories
The high market prices of ancient artworks are often significantly influenced by their historical significance, particularly the provenance and ownership histories. Provenance, the documented history of an artwork’s ownership, acts as both a testament to its authenticity and a historical narrative that enhances its value. This narrative becomes a compelling story for collectors, often justifying high valuations.
Recent work by Müller (2023) demonstrates the powerful impact of provenance on market prices, especially in the context of late Gothic Spanish sculpture. Müller’s research into the archives of the Museum Mayer van den Bergh reveals the trajectory of Pedro Millán’s terracotta statuette of Saint George. The intricate ownership history of the statuette, which includes various high-profile agents and dealers, significantly bolstered its market valuation. The detailed provenance provided a crucial layer of authenticity and historical context that appealed to collectors. As information travels among collectors’ networks, it amplifies the economic worth of the artwork. This phenomenon underscores the growing importance of digitizing and making such archival information accessible for further valuation and academic scrutiny.
Keim’s (2023) work on Nazi-looted art further illustrates the complex interplay between provenance and market value. The restitution of Nazi-looted artworks aims to correct market inefficiencies by restoring legal title and historical justice. Provenance research in this context involves a meticulous process of tracing the artwork’s ownership history, often complicated by wartime seizures and illicit transactions. The creation of the Holocaust Expropriated Art Restitution (HEAR) Fund, as proposed by Keim, seeks to address these complexities. By establishing a comprehensive database for provenance information and facilitating compensated restitution, the HEAR Fund aims to reintroduce these artworks into the market with clear legal titles. This increases their market value while also serving ethical and moral imperatives. The combination of economic theory and humanistic principles in provenance research showcases its dual role in elevating market prices and ensuring historical accountability.
The illustrious book “The Drawings of the Florentine Painters” by Berenson (1903) adds a historical dimension to understanding the influence of provenance. Although lacking a modern abstract, Berenson’s in-depth cataloging of Florentine artworks provides extensive provenance details which have historically been pivotal in assigning value to these pieces. His work underscores the foundational role that such documentation plays in authenticating and subsequently valuing artworks. Provenance research, as elucidated by Berenson, entails a rigorous examination of historical records, auction catalogs, and artist correspondences. This meticulous documentation not only protects the artwork’s legacy but also enhances its desirability in the market.
The intersection of provenance and market prices highlights the evolving methods by which historical documentation is leveraged to ascertain an artwork’s value. In the digital age, the accessibility and transparency of provenance records are easier to maintain, thus increasing the frequency and accuracy of provenance claims. Collectors are more inclined to invest in artworks with well-documented histories, as these provide not only financial security but also a connection to a broader historical and cultural narrative.
In conclusion, the historical significance attributed through provenance and ownership histories is indispensable in understanding the high market prices of ancient artworks. Research by Müller emphasizes the economic and academic benefits of digitizing archival records, while Keim’s proposal addresses the ethical and market implications of restoring Nazi-looted art. Together with Berenson’s foundational work, these studies collectively underscore the multifaceted role of provenance in art valuation. They illuminate how historical documentation can transform an artwork into a highly coveted cultural artifact, intertwining its economic value with intrinsic historical worth, thereby affecting not just individual market transactions, but the broader landscape of art and cultural heritage preservation.
1.2 Rarity and Material Value: Unique Pieces and Precious Materials
The high market prices of ancient artworks are often driven by the dual factors of rarity and the intrinsic material value of the pieces themselves. These elements create a potent combination that attracts collectors, investors, and institutions alike. The rarity of such works, often produced by long-gone civilizations and representing unique historical narratives, inherently limits their availability. Additionally, the materials used in the creation of these artworks—often precious metals and stones—further amplify their value.
The concept of rarity in ancient artworks is multi-faceted. Firstly, the simple passage of time means that fewer pieces have survived the millennia. Catastrophes like wars, natural disasters, and neglect have contributed to the loss of countless artifacts, making those that have survived exceptionally rare. Secondly, the provenance of an artwork plays a crucial role in its valuation (Haab, Lewis, & Whitehead, 2020). A well-documented history that traces back to notable owners or historical periods can significantly elevate an object’s value. In many cases, the line of previous ownership can add a layer of narrative that makes the item more appealing to high-end collectors.
Moreover, the material composition of ancient artworks has a significant impact on their market prices. Many ancient pieces are crafted from precious metals such as gold, silver, and platinum, or adorned with gemstones like lapis lazuli and emeralds. These materials not only have intrinsic monetary values but also add an aesthetic richness that enhances the artifact’s overall appeal (Ksenzhuk, 2018). The use of precious materials in ancient times often signified status and power, which is a legacy that still resonates with modern collectors and investors. Gold, in particular, has historically been a stable store of value, making it highly sought after. Its use in ancient artifacts adds an extra layer of desirability due to the combination of historical and material values.
Economic theories also help explain the high market valuations of ancient artworks. The contingent valuation method (CVM), traditionally used in environmental economics to value nonmarket goods, can be analogously applied to the art market to estimate the perceived value of rare and precious items (Haab, Lewis, & Whitehead, 2020). CVM involves creating hypothetical scenarios to gauge what buyers would be willing to pay, thereby revealing preferences and perceived values that are not immediately apparent in straightforward market transactions. This methodology is particularly relevant in understanding the premium placed on artworks that possess both rarity and material value.
The economic landscape of ancient times, such as the Roman Empire, further provides context to the valuation of art pieces from those eras. The “high-end” production of Roman artworks often involved materials that were not just valuable but also rare, involving complex supply chains and trade routes that spanned continents (Harris, 2015). When these artifacts reappear in modern markets, they bring with them the accumulated value of millennia, enhanced by their historical and material importance.
However, the valuation and market dynamics of precious materials are influenced by broader economic factors. The precious metals market, for example, is subject to various global economic conditions, including liquidity risks and financial crises (Ksenzhuk, 2018). Precious metals serve as hedging tools against these risks, further enhancing their desirability. This economic backdrop adds another layer of value to ancient artworks composed of such materials. The Antiquities Act of 1906 also plays a critical role in this context by regulating the excavation and trade of these valuable artifacts, thereby ensuring their rarity and preserving their value over time.
In summary, the high market prices of ancient artworks are inextricably linked to their rarity and the precious materials used in their creation. These factors are deeply intertwined with historical contexts and modern economic theories that collectively elevate the perceived value of these artifacts. Understanding this complex interplay of elements is crucial for appreciating why ancient artworks continue to command such high prices in today’s market.
2.1 Market Dynamics and Investment Potential: Financialization of Art
The high market prices of ancient artworks have profoundly affected the contemporary art market, particularly through the process of financialization. As ancient art achieves monumental prices, it sets a precedent for the valuation of contemporary art, making artworks more than mere cultural artifacts but also appealing financial investments. This intricate blend of artistic value and financial potential has fundamentally altered market dynamics and the behaviors of both buyers and sellers.
Financialization, the process by which financial markets shape and determine the value of goods and services, has notably permeated the contemporary art market. Emmert (2018) dissects this phenomenon, highlighting the behavioral economics behind it. Art’s volatility and lack of regulation have allowed the financial services industry to exploit contemporary art markets, using art as collateral for significant assets such as pension funds. This trend mirrors those in financial derivatives, creating considerable risks due to the instability and unpredictability of art valuations.
Moreover, market transparency has become a dual-edged sword. As Ivanova (2016) emphasizes, contemporary art theoretically disrupts financialization due to its opaque nature. Still, emerging practices, such as using art as financial collateral and implementing new marketplace logics, increasingly intertwine art with financial instruments. This intersection has pushed contemporary art closer to financial assets, mirroring socio-cultural behaviors typically reserved for high-stakes financial markets. The overlap between valuation practices in financial markets and contemporary art is thus becoming more pronounced, contributing to a more holistic understanding of art’s value that integrates economic and socio-cultural dimensions.
Zarobell (2021) extends this discussion by illustrating how the contemporary art market has evolved to include alternative forms of value creation, such as art collectives and festivals. These alternatives challenge the market’s dominance as the ultimate arbiter of cultural value. High valuations of ancient artworks have bolstered art’s financial worth, creating a cascading effect that propels contemporary pieces into similar financial frameworks. Thus, while ancient art’s exalted prices uplift contemporary art as a financial symbol, they simultaneously inspire movements that seek to decentralize financial dominance in valuing art.
This intricate web of financial relationships fundamentally shifts the behaviors of both investors and artists. High ancient art valuations increase the attractiveness of art as a lucrative investment, which in turn influences production trends and market practices. Artists and galleries, recognizing the potential for financial gain, may prioritize market-friendly creativity over purely aesthetic or cultural contributions. This was a dynamic rooted in early economic theories, as seen in Smith’s (1776) fundamental treatises on value and wealth. His principles on market behaviors and valuation echo into the contemporary art world, where the worth of art now embodies a substantive financial dimension.
In this intricate ecosystem, the financialization of art stands as a complex, multifaceted phenomenon driven by the rising prices of ancient artworks. These valuations not only bolster contemporary art as financial assets but also reshape market dynamics, urging both artists and investors to navigate an environment where cultural worth and financial potential are increasingly intertwined. Contemporary art, viewed through this financial lens, navigates a precarious balance, with artists and collectors alike disavowing traditional art world norms in favor of financial logic and market practices. This convergence is reshaping art as both a cultural artifact and an investment, perpetuating a robust yet complex relationship between art, market dynamics, and financialization.
2.2 Influence on Artistic Trends and Practices: Shifts in Artistic Production
The high market valuations of ancient artworks significantly influence contemporary artistic trends and production practices, shaping the creative landscape in multifaceted ways. Artists, galleries, and institutions respond to these valuations by adjusting their production methodologies, exploring alternative spaces, and redefining their approaches to art consumption and production. These shifts reflect a complex interplay between market forces, creation, and cultural reproduction, contributing to evolving artistic paradigms.
One remarkable aspect of contemporary art production influenced by market forces is the heightened awareness of artistic value and market potential among young and emerging artists. Howard (2022) emphasizes that youth arts programs can serve as enablers of common cultural dispositions and platforms for artistic production and reproduction. These programs celebrate young people not only as consumers but also as vital producers of cultural capital, navigating a landscape deeply entrenched in social class disadvantage. The ethnographic methodology highlighted in Howard’s research underscores how everyday creativity and forms of resistance are integral to young artists’ development. Despite the potential for transformative impact, the mechanisms of reproduction often perpetuate existing social hierarchies, illustrating how market-driven valuations can influence the trajectory of emerging artists.
Acknowledging the market’s uncertainties, artists have sought alternative spaces to assert greater control over their creative output. Sooudi (2020) explores the role of artist-led spaces in Mumbai as strategies to navigate the volatile market context. These spaces foster collectivist practices, emphasizing social bonds and community over the isolated genius model of artistic production. In these environments, artists challenge neoliberal ideas that prioritize autonomy and independence, instead advocating for collaborative approaches that resist market-led demands. Although these spaces are oriented towards supporting individual market success, they represent a significant shift in how contemporary artists engage with and respond to market pressures.
The influence of high market prices also extends to artists with migration backgrounds, who navigate distinct cultural and political landscapes in their creative processes. Pishkhani and Backer (2024) highlight the micro-politics of artistic production among migrant artists in Brussels. Through initiatives like textile-making and live radio, these artists reclaim space and foster solidarity, challenging neo-colonial dynamics and traditional artistic methodologies. By repurposing domestic practices for public exhibition, they dismantle the dichotomy between private and public spheres, broadening the scope of contemporary artistic expression. This approach not only supports the integration of migrant artists into the broader cultural scene but also demonstrates how high market valuations drive diversified and inclusive practices within the art world.
Marshall McLuhan’s seminal work “Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man” (1964) provides additional context for examining the broad influence of high market valuations on contemporary art. McLuhan’s theory of media as extensions of human faculties offers insights into how contemporary artists leverage various media forms to expand their reach and impact in response to market imperatives. The integration of new media technologies in artistic practices exemplifies the shifts in production driven by the need to capture market attention and engage with broader audiences. Thus, the fusion of traditional and new media becomes a strategic response to market valuations, enabling artists to navigate and thrive in an increasingly complex and competitive environment.
In conclusion, the high market prices of ancient artworks compel contemporary artists to adapt their production practices in innovative and multifaceted ways. From integrating into youth arts programs to establishing alternative spaces and renegotiating cultural thresholds, artists navigate and respond to the intricate dynamics of market valuations. These changes not only reflect the evolving nature of artistic production but also highlight the resilience and adaptability of the contemporary art world in the face of market pressures.
3.1 Ethical Considerations and Legal Frameworks: Art Repatriation and Regulation
The high market prices of ancient artworks raise significant ethical and legal questions about the preservation of cultural heritage. The escalating value of these pieces often fuels their illicit trade, which in turn, puts pressure on ethical considerations and existing legal frameworks. This subchapter will examine the complex interplay between market forces, ethical considerations, and legal protocols in the realm of art repatriation and regulation.
One of the foundational aspects of cultural heritage preservation in the context of legal frameworks is the notion of “public good.” According to Ross (2021), cultural heritage protection is often viewed through the lens of public interest, balancing private ownership rights against societal benefits. Ross argues that heritage easements and conservation servitudes under Canadian law serve as useful mechanisms to protect built heritage. These legal tools can be pivotal in preserving the historical and aesthetic value of ancient artworks, ensuring they remain accessible to the public while still respecting the rights of private owners. In this sense, the legal system in Canada, blending common law and civil law traditions, provides a balanced approach to the stewardship of cultural assets. These frameworks offer a practical model for other jurisdictions grappling with similar issues.
The international dimension of art repatriation involves an array of legal frameworks designed to address the illicit trade in cultural property. Vilá (2021) provides a comprehensive analysis of the legal measures in place between Mexico and the United States to curb the trafficking of pre-Columbian antiquities. The contrast between these two neighboring countries, each with its unique legal principles, underscores the complexity of regulating the art market. Vilá notes that while the U.S. serves as a significant player in the global art market and a gatekeeper for cultural property, both countries have engaged in successful cooperative efforts to return stolen artifacts. Various bilateral agreements and international conventions, such as those adopted by UNESCO, are cited as effective tools for mitigating illicit trade and promoting repatriation. However, the ongoing challenges suggest that a more expansive view, incorporating globalization and the nuances of different legal systems, is essential for improving the efficacy of these frameworks.
In the context of Indonesia, as explored by Smith, Ristiawan, and Sudarmadi (2023), post-independence legislation has aimed to address the challenges of cultural heritage protection and repatriation. The authors highlight that while Indonesia has made strides in creating legal structures for heritage preservation, enforcement remains problematic. One key issue is the State-centric approach, which often marginalizes local communities and hampers locally-led activism. This approach can impede effective repatriation efforts and community engagement in cultural heritage preservation. The authors advocate for co-creation in knowledge production and crime-prevention strategies to enhance the effectiveness of repatriation processes and to restore a sense of ownership and agency to the communities affected by colonial looting.
The UNESCO Convention of 1970 is another cornerstone in the international legal landscape aimed at prohibiting and preventing the illicit transfer of cultural property. This convention has been pivotal in establishing guidelines and protocols for the treatment of cultural artifacts across borders. By emphasizing the responsibilities of states to regulate the import, export, and transfer of ownership of cultural property, the convention provides a robust framework for international cooperation. It also seeks to reduce the illegal circulation of cultural goods by bringing greater visibility and ethical scrutiny to the trade of ancient artworks (UNESCO, 1970). However, the implementation of the Convention’s principles varies across countries, depending on their domestic legal frameworks and commitment to cultural heritage preservation.
In summary, the high market prices of ancient artworks necessitate a nuanced approach to legal and ethical issues surrounding their trade and repatriation. The challenges are multifaceted, involving international cooperation, robust legal mechanisms, and the engagement of local communities. By exploring the legal frameworks in Canada, the United States, Mexico, and Indonesia, and reflecting on international conventions such as UNESCO’s, it becomes clear that an integrated and holistic approach is required to address the ethical dilemmas and regulatory challenges posed by the high valuation of ancient art. This approach not only helps in curbing illicit trade but also ensures that cultural heritage is preserved and respected for future generations.
3.2 Role of Museums and Public Institutions: Balancing Access and Ownership
The role of museums and public institutions in balancing access to and ownership of ancient artworks has become increasingly complex in the face of mounting market pressures. The astronomical valuations of ancient art pieces not only impact their accessibility but also pose significant challenges to cultural heritage preservation. These high market prices create a paradox where public institutions, tasked with preserving and showcasing cultural heritage, must navigate an art market heavily influenced by private collectors and commercial galleries.
One of the critical challenges that museums face is the financial disparity between public institutions and private collectors. As detailed by Quemin (2020), the art market has seen a substantial shift in power towards collectors and high-end galleries, who often possess the resources to acquire and exhibit artworks that rival public institutions. This imbalance is highlighted in the case of prominent collectors like Bernard Arnault and François Pinault, who control significant art collections and can exert considerable influence over museum acquisitions and exhibitions. This growing trend underscores a broader issue where the commodification of art complicates the mission of public institutions, which strive to maintain art as a public good rather than a private asset.
Moreover, museums along historical routes such as the Silk Road have attempted to address these disparities by focusing on inclusive heritage education and the promotion of local cultural identity. As Huerta (2021) explains, museums on the Silk Road emphasize the educational and cultural aspects that define their communities. These museums function not only as repositories of art but also as centers for cultural education and dialogue. For instance, the Valencia Silk Museum highlights the historical significance of silk production in local culture, enhancing community engagement and identity. By prioritizing education and local heritage, these museums attempt to counterbalance the influence of the high art market and ensure broader public access to cultural treasures.
Another aspect that complicates the role of museums in the context of high market prices is the ethical dilemmas surrounding art repatriation. The discourse on art repatriation is epitomized by the debate over the Elgin Marbles, detailed by Merryman (1986). The case highlights the ethical and legal frameworks that govern the possession and return of cultural artifacts. Public institutions often find themselves at the crossroads of these debates, balancing the demands of source countries for the return of heritage objects and the expectations of global audiences. The high market value of such objects adds another layer of complexity, as it may influence the decisions of both possessing countries and institutions about the fate of these artifacts.
In response to these challenges, museums have begun to adopt more collaborative and inclusive approaches to cultural heritage preservation. Partnerships between public institutions and private entities are becoming more common, aiming to leverage the resources and influence of the private sector while ensuring public access to art. For instance, some museums have developed loan programs and joint exhibitions with private collectors and galleries to provide broader access to significant artworks. These collaborations can serve as a means to democratize access to high-value art pieces, although they must be carefully managed to avoid further commodification and loss of control by public institutions.
In conclusion, the role of museums and public institutions in balancing access and ownership of ancient artworks is multifaceted and fraught with challenges. High market prices compound these challenges by elevating the value of art as a financial asset, often placing it beyond the reach of public institutions. However, through strategic partnerships, focused educational missions, and ethical frameworks, museums can navigate these pressures and continue to serve as stewards of cultural heritage. They must persist in prioritizing public access and educational value over market dynamics, ensuring that cultural treasures remain a common heritage rather than exclusive commodities.
Summary:
This essay investigates the intricate dynamics that contribute to the elevated market prices of ancient artworks and their broader implications for contemporary artistic practices and cultural heritage preservation. The research is driven by the central question of what factors underlie the significant financial valuations of ancient artworks and how these valuations resonate within present-day art markets and preservation efforts. The discourse begins with a thorough examination of provenance and ownership histories as pivotal components in determining an artwork’s value. It showcases recent findings, particularly from Müller and Keim, which illustrate how the documentation of an artwork’s ownership not only enhances its authenticity but creates compelling narratives that appeal to collectors, subsequently elevating the market valuation of these cultural artifacts.
The essay further discusses the elements of rarity and material value, positing that the combination of these factors greatly influences market pricing. As explored through the works of Haab, Lewis, and Whitehead, the metaphor of scarcity plays a vital role; the notion that ancient artworks are often the sole remaining remnants of bygone civilizations solidifies their desirability. The intrinsic value linked to precious materials, such as gold and other significant artifacts, intertwines historical context with modern investment mechanisms, complicating the market landscape. Additionally, the financialization of art is highlighted, revealing how the soaring prices of ancient landscapes have set precedents that influence the valuation of contemporary works, as evidenced in the analyses by Emmert and Ivanova. The shift towards treating art as a financial asset underscores the need for artists and institutions to adapt to a market increasingly defined by economic imperatives.
Concluding the essay, the pressing ethical and legal considerations surrounding art repatriation and cultural heritage preservation emerge as critical issues. The conflict between private ownership and public access to cultural heritage is dissected, providing a nuanced understanding of how high market valuations exacerbate these tensions. By reviewing existing legal frameworks, such as the UNESCO Convention of 1970 and various national laws, the conclusion emphasizes the need for cooperative strategies that promote equitable distribution of cultural artifacts. Ultimately, the essay reaffirms that while the high market prices of ancient artworks reflect significant cultural and historical value, they simultaneously pose challenges to preservation, accessibility, and ethical stewardship of cultural heritage, urging stakeholders to navigate these complexities thoughtfully.
References:
Berenson, B. (1903). The Drawings of the Florentine Painters. University of Chicago Press.
Emmert, H. R.. (2018). Selling Out: The Financialization of Contemporary Art. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3303513
Haab, T., Lewis, L. Y., & Whitehead, J.. (2020). State of the Art of Contingent Valuation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.450
Harris, W. V.. (2015). Prolegomena to a Study of the Economics of Roman Art. American Journal of Archaeology, 119, 395–417. https://doi.org/10.3764/aja.119.3.0395
Howard, F.. (2022). Artistic Production and (Re)production: Youth Arts Programmes as Enablers of Common Cultural Dispositions. Cultural Sociology, 16, 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755211066371
Huerta, R.. (2021). Silk Road Museums: Design of Inclusive Heritage and Cross-Cultural Education. Sustainability, 13(11), 6020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116020
Ivanova, V.. (2016). Contemporary art and financialization: Two approaches. Finance and Society, 2(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.2218/finsoc.v2i2.1726
Keim, S.. (2023). Plunder and Provenance: Using Restitution to Correct a Market Defect. The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts. https://doi.org/10.52214/jla.v46i2.11019
Ksenzhuk, O.. (2018). DETERMINANT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRECIOUS METALS MARKET AND PECULIARITIES OF INVESTMENTS IN PRECIOUS METALS. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, 4, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2018.00694
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Routledge.
Merryman, J.H. (1986). Thinking about the Elgin Marbles. University of Michigan Press.
Müller, U.. (2023). The Reception of Late Gothic Spanish Sculpture around 1900: A Case Study of Collectors’ Archives as a Tool for Art-Market Research. Getty Research Journal, 18, 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1086/726886
Pishkhani, G. R., & Backer, M. D.. (2024). The Micro-Politics of Artistic Production among Artists with a Migration Background. Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13060281
Quemin, A.. (2020). The market and museums: the increasing power of collectors and private galleries in the contemporary art world. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 19, 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2020.1804705
Ross, S. G.. (2021). Heritage preservation easements, urban property, and heritage law: Exploring Canadian common law and civil law tools for responding to international cultural preservation frameworks for cities. University of Toronto Law Journal, 72, 436–467. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2021-0059
Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
Smith, E., Ristiawan, R., & Sudarmadi, T.. (2023). Protection and Repatriation of Cultural Heritage – Country Report: Indonesia. Santander Art and Culture Law Review. https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.025.17038
Sooudi, O. K.. (2020). Alternative Spaces & Artist Agency in the Art Market. Arts, 9(4), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts9040116
The Antiquities Act of 1906.
UNESCO Convention of 1970 on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property.
Vilá, C. S. Q.. (2021). On the Borderline – Using National and International Legal Frameworks to Address the Traffic of Pre-Columbian Antiquities between Mexico and the United States. Santander Art and Culture Law Review. https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050xsnr.21.018.15263
Zarobell, J.. (2021). Arts Special Issue “The Contemporary Art Market”. Arts, 10(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts10030043
